The Human Margin Clarity System by Emi Linds is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Human Margin Clarity System and the Human Margin for AI is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, technological, or professional advice. While the concepts presented are intended to support ethical leadership and responsible innovation, implementation of this framework is at the sole discretion and responsibility of the user. No guarantees are made regarding specific outcomes. The author disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this material.
Emi Linds is a strategist, creative technologist, and author of The Human Margin for AI – a framework for responsible AI, organizational clarity, and narrative-led systems change. She writes at the intersection of human-centered AI, empathy design, and innovation. Based in Canada, Emi lives with her husband and they are raising two tiny future innovators.
Designed with heart️ by Emi Linds
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/emilinds/
You are reading:
The future won’t wait
Legacy hierarchy gave protection to those trained by systems where survival meant playing it safe. Ambiguity gave protection to those hurt by systems that punished directness.
Neither are flaws. Both are adaptations to the ways of the past.
In the systems being built today though, neither model scales cleanly.
An observation of a pattern
What looks like resistance to change might be preservation of control and identity.
These are protective mechanisms that came out in response to scrutiny and punishment.
What the data (and fieldwork) say
Systems built on positional power tend to centralize blame and silence innovation.
Systems don’t scale on feelings, they scale on clarity.
When you scale ambiguity, you scale confusion.
What does scale?
Reminder to Self
I’ve always had compassion for those afraid of change. That’s why I kept stepping in, translating, educating, helping with knowledge and skill gaps. It often meant late nights and unpaid time and labour.
I never resented it, but I also didn’t fully see the cost on my family and I.
Now I understand: empathy is essential, but it is not enough.
We need to say:
And also:
Lead with care. Reorient with truth.
The question that I can’t stop thinking about…
What if… instead of blaming (another cognitive distortion), we built systems that don’t require fear to function?
What if then… becomes now?
Keep Reading